|
IMMIGRATION UPDATE
Latest Processing Times
Click
for INS Processing Times
Click
for Monthly Visa Bulletin
Click
for Department of Labor Processing Times
Click
for INS Guidance on Substitute Sponsor Where Petitioner
Has Died
DV 2005 Click
for Do-It-Yourself Instructions
Click
To Notify INS Of Address Change
Click
for AILA's "Connect" Business Immigration Newsletter
CONNECT
April/May 2005
IN THIS ISSUE: H-1B Cap
Reached, Legislation Introduced; Immigration Reform
Gets a Boost; Renewed Congressional Debate over L-1
Visa Program, Business Support Critical; USCIS Hikes
Immigration Processing Fees; US-VISIT Creates New
Hoops for International Personnel; H-2B Cap Hit,
Legislation to Save Summer Pending.
Immigrants
Action Alert- May Edition
Click
The newsletter to inform and activate
immigrants and their families
Volume 3, No. 1 May 2004
***NEW
INSTANT MESSAGING SERVICE***
Click
For Details
October
17, 2006
RIR
Conversion Possible for Most Labor Certifications at
BPCs,
The
U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) has expanded the
ability to convert traditional, or TR /
non-Reduction in Recruitment, labor certifications
to Reduction in Recruitment (RIR) cases. This
expansion means that most traditional cases that are
pending in the Backlog Processing Centers (BPCs) can
be converted to RIR cases.
DOL
RIR Conversion FAQ
Question
1. Why would an employer want to convert a TR case
to RIR?
Timing. RIR cases generally are processed to receive
decisions more quickly, since they do not undergo
the same recruitment method.
Question 2. Is there a date or deadline by which
the original application had to be filed?
Yes. The applications had to be postmarked on or
before March 28, 2005.
Comment : The date of March 28, 2005 appears to be a
typographical error in the FAQs. The Federal
Register Notice carries the cutoff date of on or
before March 27, 2005. The March 27, 2005 date was
the last date to file under the pre-PERM system.
Anything filed on or after March 28, 2005 would have
been under the PERM system.
Question 3. Who may request the conversion?
The conversion must be requested by the employer or
by the designated attorney or agent. Foreign
national beneficiaries may not make the request.
Question 4. Can Schedule B occupations use these
procedures?
No. Under current regulations Schedule B
applications cannot use the RIR process.
Comment : Schedule B should not be confused with
Schedule A. Schedule A cases are pre-certified as
shortage occupations and do not need labor
certifications. Schedule B cases, essentially, are
the opposite. They are for occupations that the DOL
has recognized as generally having sufficient U.S.
workers available. Typical Schedule B occupations
include: bookkeepers, cashiers, service station
attendants, taxi drivers, domestic household workers
without a year's paid experience, clerk-typists,
sales clerks, and general kitchen workers.
Question 5. Is there a deadline for making the
RIR request?
No, but the case is no longer eligible for RIR
conversion once the BPC has started the recruitment
process. Thus, if an employer waits, the case may
end up going through the supervised recruitment
under the TR / regular labor process. The BPCs will
not delay their start of recruitment to accommodate
an employer's request for RIR conversion, which
cannot be made before recruitment is begun, but only
at the time of submitting the RIR conversion. The
request must arrive prior to the start of supervised
recruitment.
Question 6. What documents are needed to make the
request?
The RIR request must be accompanied by a written
request for conversion, contact information
regarding the application (including an eMail
address), documentation establishing a pattern of
recruitment within the six months preceding the date
the conversion request is received by the BPC, and
proof that any U.S. workers who applied for the job
were rejected for lawful, job-related reasons. There
must be documentation of the recruitment process
used and the results of those efforts.
Comment : Since the RIR request must be accompanied
by recruitment efforts and results, it seems that it
is entirely possible that an employer could begin
the RIR recruitment, only to find out that the BPC
started supervised recruitment and eliminated the
conversion option before the conversion request
could be submitted. It is likely that earlier-filed
cases that have been pending with the DOL are at
higher risk.
Question 7. How will these cases be processed?
The BPCs will process the requests on a first-come,
first-served basis. The response time will depend
upon the volume of such requests. The DOL will not
be sending confirmation of receipt.
Comment : As there were many who rushed to file
without time to engage in recruitment efforts
immediately before PERM started, there may be many
such requests. We also note that, while the DOL has
stated that the labor certifications in the BPCs are
processed in a first-in / first-out (FIFO) order,
the approvals that we have received have had
wide-ranging priority dates with no indication of
the FIFO system.
Question 8. What happens if the RIR conversion
request is granted?
The employer or attorney will be notified by eMail.
The case will be moved from TR processing to RIR
processing and then processed based on the initial
filing date (priority date).
Question 9. What if the RIR conversion request is
not granted?
The case will remain in the TR processing queue. The
attorney or employer will be notified by eMail that
the request was denied.
Question 10. What if the case was filed using RIR
previously, but that request was denied? What if the
employer attempted to convert the case to RIR
previously, but was not successful?
These cases are still eligible to request RIR
conversions. The employer will have to remedy the
problems with the previous RIR request/s.
Question 11. In order to establish a
"pattern of recruitment," which date is
used as the reference point?
The reference point for the pattern of recruitment
within six months is based on the date the RIR
conversion request is received by the BPC. Thus, any
advertisements must have been placed within six
months of the request to convert to RIR. Earlier
recruitment will not be considered.
Question 12. Can the priority date be lost in
trying to convert? Is the application withdrawn?
No. Whether or not the request to convert is
accepted, the priority date does not change. The
original application is not deemed or otherwise
withdrawn.
Question 13. Does the prevailing wage used in the
recruitment have to meet the 100 percent level?
Yes. The current regulations require that
recruitment be at 100 percent of the prevailing
wage.
October 11, 2006
DOS Issues Notice
on Registration for the 2008 Diversity Immigrant
Visa Program
http://www.dvlottery.state.gov
The NSC Accepts
Concurrent I-485 Filings for Premium Processing
Eligible I-140s
The Nebraska Service Center has confirmed that
it is accepting concurrent filings of I-140 and
I-485s for I-140s eligible for premium processing.
The I-140 will be processed pursuant to the
premium processing program and the I-485 and any
concurrently filed I-765 and I-131 applications
will be processed pursuant to regular processing
time lines. Remember that the beneficiary of the
I-485 application must have an immigrant number
immediately available to qualify for the
concurrent filing.
U.S. Economy
Needs Skilled Foreign Workers
by AILA InfoNet
The recent debate over immigration policy
commonly depicts immigrants as undocumented,
uneducated people who flood our borders without
inspection. Although many immigrants who enter
this country are unskilled laborers who provide
essential services in many sectors of our economy,
of equal importance to the immigration debate are
the highly educated foreign professionals whose
skills play a vital role in the enrichment of our
economy. These foreign born workers bring unique
perspectives and expertise that are essential to
maintaining America's competitive edge as the
leader of the global marketplace.
The United States economy has shifted
significantly over the past fifty years. We are no
longer the blue collar nation that we once were.
The transformation of our economy from a
manufacturing economy to a knowledge-based economy
has created a growing demand for highly skilled
technical workers. This demand has been
accompanied by a decline in the number of
native-born students seeking degrees in the fields
of science, engineering and technology. Our
prestigious graduate institutions currently train
more foreign nationals than U.S. citizens in these
important fields. These U.S trained specialists,
both native and foreign-born, cannot fill the
demand for highly-skilled workers in key
occupations. U.S. businesses must be able to
recruit and hire additional foreign-born
professionals to alleviate temporary labor
shortages in specific occupations.
To keep America competitive, we must increase
the number of specialized worker visas awarded.
H-1B visas, or temporary skilled worker visas, are
currently capped at only 65,000 annually. Yet in
recent years, this "cap" is reached in a
couple of months and U.S. businesses are barred
from hiring foreign-born professionals for the
remainder of the fiscal year. In order to increase
the number of highly skilled professionals in this
country, we must reform the employment based
immigration system and provide a sufficient amount
of avenues through which U.S. businesses can
legally employ specialized workers.
At the same time, we must increase recruitment
and training of U.S. students as well - in order
to accelerate this process, a hefty portion of the
processing fees for the H visas are directed to
the education and training of U.S. students in
science and technology.
It is important that skilled workers are not
overlooked in the current debate regarding
comprehensive immigration reform. Raising the H-1B
visa cap is vital to maintaining our leadership in
the world market. We must retain the educated
professionals whom we have trained internally in
order to benefit from the unique skills that they
possess. By sending the best and the brightest
workers back to their respective countries, we
only create competition for ourselves, thereby
diminishing America's economic clout. By retaining
foreign nationals, we may ensure that U.S.
businesses have the most highly qualified workers
in their fields, helping America maintain its edge
in an increasingly competitive global economy. the
most highly qualified workers in their fields,
guaranteeing maximum success and economic
prosperity.
August
18, 2006
Premium
Processing To Be Expanded
August
8, 2006
USCIS
Q & A On Student Status
Click
For Details
I-140 Premium
Processing Update
USCIS has told AILA that the plan to
expand premium processing to certain I-140
petitions may be announced soon, targeted to be
effective by the end of August. The exact date had
not been set. Pursuant to the notice published at
71 FR 29571-74 (5/23/06), USCIS will inform the
public of the change by posting the information on
its website www.uscis.gov.
July 28, 2006
H-1B Cap Reached
20,000 Slots Reserved for
U.S. Advanced Degree Graduates Exhausted
Washington, D.C. - On July 28th, the U.S.
Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS)
announced that, as of July 26th, it had received
enough H-1B petitions for "foreign workers who
have earned a master's degree or higher from a U.S.
institution of higher education" to meet the
exemption limit of 20,000 established by Congress
for fiscal year (FY) 2007. This is on top of having
reached the overall H-1B cap of 65,000 on May 6,
more than four months before the start of the fiscal
year.
June
15, 2006
Cap
Treatment of H-1B Petitions Delivered to VSC Prior
to Cap Cut-Off But Not Yet Receipted
USCIS
has confirmed to AILA that any cap-subject H-1B
received at the VSC mailroom prior to the cut-off
day will be considered under the cap regardless of
whether it was data entered. Any cap-subject H1-B
petition received on the cut-off day will be
eligible for random selection. USCIS also advised
that as of close-of-business yesterday VSC had data
entered through 5/25.
May
26, 2006
USCIS NOTIFIES PUBLIC OF
PREMIUM PROCESSING CHANGES
WASHINGTON, DC – May 24, 2006 -
USCIS recently published a notice in the Federal
Register identifying certain forms for addition
to an expanded Premium Processing Service. These
forms types include most immigrant worker petitions
(Form I-140), selected applications to change or
extend nonimmigrant status (Form I-539), and
applications to renew employment authorization
documents for foreign nationals with pending
employment-based applications to adjust status (Form
I-765).
Please note that USCIS Service
Centers will not accept filings for any of
these form types under the Premium Processing
Service until a formal announcement is made on the
USCIS web site (www.uscis.gov) announcing the
specific start dates for acceptance of the new form
types. Until that date is established and announced,
USCIS Service Centers will reject any Premium
Processing filings for I-140s, I-539s or I-765s.
H-1B USAGE AS OF MAY 23, 2006
| |
Cap
|
Beneficiaries
Approved
|
Beneficiaries
Pending
|
Beneficiary
Target 1 |
Total
|
Date
of Last Count
|
|
H-1B
|
58,200
2
|
7,396
|
37,754
|
61,000
|
45,150
|
5/23/2006
|
|
H-1B
Advance Degree Exemption
|
20,000
|
1,611
|
3,944
|
21,000
|
5,555
|
5/23/2006
|
March 3, 2006
DOL Releases PERM FAQ Sets 6 &
7
Click
DOL recently released Set 6 of its list of PERM
FAQs. This list addresses a number of issues,
including making corrections to filed PERM
applications; re-applying after a denied application
for certification; request for review pending with
the BALCA; incorrect or incomplete prevailing wage
determinations; and entering years of experience,
education or training on ETA Form 9089.
February
3, 2006
Green
Card/Visa Availability - Jan 2006 Update
Department of State has advised that it
has seen a decrease in demand for employment-based
visa numbers for USCIS adjustment of status cases.
This has resulted in the rapid advancement of the
established cut-off dates. DOS does not want to be
in a position where there are large amounts of
numbers available for use late in the fiscal year,
and not enough time to make use of them. But,
when/if the USCIS demand does materialize it may
be necessary to hold or retrogress (at some point)
those dates. Below are DOS' comments on the
outlook for employment-based numbers:
"Worldwide: Based on the current level of
number use in the Employment First and Second
preference categories there will be no need to
impose a cut-off date for the categories. While
the First preference number use is relatively
close to my target, the Second preference is
significantly below my target which doesn't make a
lot of sense.
Third: I had been concerned that the amount of
245(i) filings during March/April 2001 would
result in a large concentration of demand, and
limit movement of the cut-off date. So far this
has not been the case, and it may be that such
cases (if they exist in large numbers) are still
in the DOL backlog.
China and India: The same lack of demand
comments apply to these First and Second
preference cut-offs. This has resulted in the
rapid advancement of the China and India cut-offs,
which I expect to continue for the next several
months.
China Third - Should stay at the Worldwide
date.
India - This cut-off should continue to move,
but such movement may become more limited. "
January 19, 2006
USCIS Reaches H-1B Exemption Cap
For Fiscal Year 2006
USCIS announced yesterday that it has received
enough H-1B petitions that qualify for the exemption
from the H-1B numerical limitations for foreign
workers with a U.S.-earned master's or higher. The
"final receipt date" for these 20,000
cap-exempt H-1B petitions is January 17, 2006.
USCIS Extends Validity of
Medical Certifications on Form I-693
In a memorandum issued January 11, 2006, Michael
Aytes, Acting Associate Director for Domestic
Operations at USCIS, announced that USCIS has
temporarily extended the validity of civil surgeon
endorsements on Form I-693 for certain adjustment of
status applicants.
DOS Advises on Fulfillment of J-1
Two Year Requirement by EU Nationals
Recent reports have indicated that EU nationals
in J nonimmigrant status may be able to fulfill the
two year home-country residence requirement in any
EU country. In response to these reports, the Visa
Office's J Waiver Division has provided the DOS
Liaison Committee with clarification of prevailing
policy: Since the INA requires two years in the
individual's country of nationality or legal
residence, and the EU is not a country, the option
of returning to any of the EU countries is not
acceptable. European nationals must fulfill the two
year requirement in their country of nationality or
legal residence.
December 21, 2005
The
Law Office of Alan E Heckler, PC has just received
its 105th PERM approval with a 100% approval record!
December 21, 2005
USCIS
Today
Official Publication
Click
Department
of Labor
DFLC Frequently Asked Questions and Answers (PERM)
December 21, 2005
Click
Alert: I-90
Interviews
If you have an I-90 application pending, be sure
to clear up any outstanding wants or warrants
prior to the I-90 interviews. Recent reports from
Los Angeles and Pittsburgh indicate that foreign
nationals with IDENT hits are being arrested,
detained or given NTAs when they appear for the
green card.
December 16, 2005
USCIS Provides Newly Updated
Counts on H-2B and H-1B Advanced Degrees Usage
USCIS has provided updated figures on fiscal year
2006 usage of H-2B first-half numbers and H-1B
numbers for graduates of U.S. advanced degree
programs. For access to these figures, visit: http://uscis.gov/graphics/services/tempbenefits/cap.htm.
Visa
Bulletin Issued for January 2006
The U.S. Department of State (DOS) has released the
Visa Bulletin for January 2006. Click for the most
recent Visa
Bulletin is always available on my site.
Following is a summary of the movement in priority
dates.
EB1
In the Employment-Based First Preference (EB1)
category, all countries except mainland China
(China) and India remain current. China's priority
date moved ahead to January 1, 2002, and India's
priority date moved ahead to July 1, 2003. This
means that persons in the EB1 category who filed
their I-140 petitions prior to these dates may, as
of January 1, 2006, file the I-485 application, be
approved through consular processing, or receive an
approval of their previously filed I-485
applications. This represents a fairly significant
forward movement in this category for both China and
India, when compared to the December 2005 Visa
Bulletin.
EB2
In the Employment-Based Second Preference (EB2)
category, all countries except China and India also
remain current. China's priority date moved ahead to
June 1, 2001, which is a four month improvement over
the December 2005 Visa Bulletin. India's EB2
priority date moved ahead to January 1, 2001, which
is a six-month forward movement.
It is a good sign for China that they have moved
past April 30, 2001, which was the 245(i) cutoff
date. There are many cases filed around that time.
It is unknown how long it will take for the numbers
for Indian nationals to reach that point.
Persons who are beneficiaries of an approved labor
certification that qualifies under EB2, and for
which the priority date is before the cutoff date,
may now move forward with their cases. If they
already have an I-485 filed, it would be eligible
for approval as of January 1, 2006. If the employer
has filed or is ready to file the I-140, then the
I-485 application could also be filed. If the I-140
selected consular processing, the case would then be
eligible to be approved through consular processing
as of January 1, 2006. The same is true for
individuals with National Interest Waiver petitions
who have priority dates prior to the newly
established cutoff dates.
EB3
In the Employment-Based Third Preference (EB3)
category, all countries are affected by
retrogression. China's priority date moved ahead to
April 1, 2001; the Philippines' priority date also
moved ahead to April 1, 2001.
India's priority date moved ahead by five months to
June 1, 1999 and Mexico's priority date moved ahead
to March 1, 2001. Individuals who are beneficiaries
of labor certifications filed before these dates,
who either have I-140 petitions pending, approved,
or eligible for filing, may now file the I-485
application. Those who have approved I-140s with
priority dates prior to the cutoff dates, may, as of
January 1, 2006, be approved through consular
processing or receive an approval of their already
pending I-485 applications.
Dates still remain substantially retrogressed. It is
likely that, absent legislation that would change
the system and/or allocate more numbers, most of the
dates that have reached April 2001 will now move
ahead slowly. These dates will likely not change
until the great number of qualifying cases filed
prior to the April 30, 2001 deadline completes the
green card process.
December
9, 2005
Recapture
of H-1 and L-1 Time Abroad
The
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS)
issued a memorandum on October 21, 2005 setting
forth the procedures for calculating the maximum
period of stay allowed for H1B and L-1
nonimmigrants. This Memo addresses only issues
pertaining to the recapture of time spent abroad. It
in no way addresses or alters the H1B extensions
beyond the six-year limitation that are commonly
referred to as seventh-year extensions. The Memo, in
simple terms, allows for persons in H1B and L-1 to
recapture each day that they spend abroad during the
standard H1B and L-1 duration.
After
PERM Approval DOL Allows Earlier Filing to Continue
The
U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) confirmed on October
17, 2005 that it does not have an official policy to
withdraw a pending labor certification that is being
processed at a Backlog Processing Center (BPC)
solely because the beneficiary obtained a PERM
approval. This
is an important clarification, due to a virtual
panic created by a policy announced a few months
ago, and then almost immediately retracted,
regarding an employer's ability to have multiple
labor certifications filed for the same
person.
September
13, 2005
EB1
And EB2 Retrogression
The
October 2005 Visa Bulletin shows severe
retrogressions in India and China employment-based
first and second preferences, and early cutoff dates
in worldwide third preference. The Bulletin
indicates that future forward movement in these
dates is likely to be limited. EB2 for India will be
rolled back to November 1, 1999. See http://travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/bulletin/bulletin_2631.html
This
means that after October 1, 2005, form I-485 cannot
be filed unless the cutoff date has reached your
priority date. However, form I-140 may still be
filed but without the I-485.
Forms
I-485, along with I-765and I-131 can still be filed
up until September 30th and EADs and advance parole
will be issued. However, even though filed, after
October 1st, the I-485 will not be processed until
the cut-off date catches up to your priority date.
For those lucky enough to have filed prior to
October 1st, work authorization and advance parole
will be issued while they are waiting for their
I-485 processing to resume.
For
those who are unable to file prior to October 1st, it
is very important that they maintain their current
status such as H-1B.
August
26, 2005
DOL
Reconsiders
In place
of the prohibition on multiple filings in the Labor
Department's August 8, 2005 FAQ on PERM, the FAQ now
states that the "Department is considering
questions and information stakeholders have
submitted in response to this FAQ posting, and will
be developing and posting a clarified response in
the near future." AILA had raised several
serious concerns about the FAQ with DOL.
H-1B
Numbers for U.S. Masters Graduates Remain
USCIS
headquarters has confirmed to AILA that, despite
rumors to the contrary, H-1B numbers remain for both
fiscal 2005 and 2006 for graduates of U.S. masters
or above programs.
August 19,
2005
DOL To
Propose Elimination of Substitutions/Imposition of
45-Day Deadline for Filing I-140s
A proposed rule that
would eliminate substitutions on labor certification
applications, impose a 45-day deadline for filing an
I-140, and add enforcement measures was cleared by
OMB on August 10, 2005. The next steps are approval
and signature at DOL, then publication in the
Federal Register. For more information: http://www.reginfo.gov/public/do/eoViewRule?ruleID=253350
DOS
Offers Online Status Checks for Passport
Applications
DOS last week introduced
a new system whereby recent passport applicants can
check the status of their applications via the
Internet. Effective as of August 12, 2005, those who
have recently applied for a U.S. passport and want
to know the status of their application may do so
online by accessing: http://travel.state.gov/passport/get/status/status_2567.html
using a standard Internet browser, then
entering in the appropriate fields their last name,
date of birth, and the last four digits of their
Social Security Number. Personal information will
remain in the system only long enough to complete
the inquiry, thus protecting that data, as
authorized by law. This information will then be
deleted from the system.
August 15, 2005
DOL
PERM Policy Announcement
The
Department of Labor (DOL) posted a new FAQ to their
PERM website that announces a major new policy
imposing penalties if more than one application for
labor certification is filed or pending by an
employer for the same individual.
The
new FAQ states that an employer may not have more
than one labor certification application actively in
process for the same individual at any given time. Click
here for the FAQ: http://workforcesecurity.doleta.gov/foreign/pdf/perm_faqs_8-8-05.pdf
PLEASE
NOTE: This policy does not affect first-time PERM
application where the employer has not previously
filed any labor certification applications for the
same individual. It also does not affect the DOL
policy permitting PERM filings that are identical to
a prior application (RIR or regular) for purposes of
recapturing a previous priority date.
We
are stunned by this policy, mostly because of
DOL’s failure to follow the required process for
promulgating a new p9olicy. It
appears that DOL’s attempt to implement the policy
would fail to comply with the federal Administrative
Procedure Act (APA). Efforts are already underway to
reverse the DOL’s position. We will keep you
informed.
August 12, 2005
H-1B
Cap Reached
EMPLOYMENT VISA
AVAILABILITY DURING FY-2006
The U.S. Department of State (DOS) has released the
September 2005 Visa Bulletin. The most recent Visa
Bulletin is always available here. September 2005 is the last
month in fiscal year (FY) 2005. Although the DOS had earlier
expressed concern that there could be retrogression in the
Employment-Based Second Preference (EB2) category, it remains
current for September 2005. Therefore, for the month of September
2005, there are enough visa numbers for all EB2 cases for all
countries.
The backlog reduction efforts of both Citizenship and Immigration
Services, and the Department of Labor continue to result in very
heavy demand for Employment-based green cards. It is anticipated
that the amount of such cases will be sufficient to use all
available numbers in many categories. As a result cut-off dates in
the Employment Third preference category will apply to the China,
India, and Philippines chargeabilities beginning in October, and it
is possible that Mexico may be added to this list. In addition, it
is anticipated that heavy demand will require the establishment of a
Third preference cut-off date on a Worldwide basis by December.
The
amount of Employment demand for applicants from China and India is
also likely to result in the oversubcription of the Employment First
and Second preference categories for those chargeability areas. The
establishment of such cut-off dates is expected to occur no later
than December.
The
level of demand in the Employment categories is expected to be far
in excess of the annual limits, and once established, cut-off date
movements are likely to be slow.
As a result of the demand created by USCIS backlog reduction
efforts, the EB3 category for India, mainland China, and the
Philippines is expected to start the year with a cut-off date. This
means that some, but not all, persons having EB3 cases from these
countries will be able to seek to complete the third stage of green
card processing starting from October 2005. To date, the DOS has not
indicated what this cut-off date might be.
If
the demand is as high as the DOS expects, the cut-off date movement
each month is likely to be quite slow. This means that it is
possible some people who have filed in the EB3 category will not be
eligible to complete their green card processing in FY2006, due to
unavailability of the necessary visa numbers.
August 11, 2005
H-1B Count
for Fiscal 2006 Moves Closer to Cap
USCIS has started updating the H-1B count on
its website on a more frequent basis. After posting
the count on August 1, 2005 for the period ended
July 29, it updated the posting to a period ending
August 4. That update showed an advance of
approximately 3,000 numbers in four business days,
and that the USCIS has, counting approved and
pipeline cases, fewer than 6,300 numbers left for
the fiscal year that starts October 1, 2005. To
monitor the count, it is suggested that you bookmark
and frequently check this item on USCIS' website: http://uscis.gov/graphics/services/tempbenefits/cap.htm.
It
USCIS
Issues Memorandum Implementing L-1 Reform Act of
2004
In a guidance memorandum issued July 28, 2005,
USCIS Associate Director of Operations William Yates
instructed the field regarding the new limitations
on L-1 eligibility for certain third-party worksite
situations and regarding the return to a 12-month
employment abroad requirement for all L-1s. Excerpts
from the Adjudicators Field Manual regarding L-1s
were included in the memorandum. Click above for
memo.
DOL Posts
New FAQs on Prevailing Wage
The Labor Department has posted on its website a
new "Frequently Asked Questions" document
relating to prevailing wage determinations for
non-agricultural programs. Included are answers to
when and where an employer can obtain prevailing
wage information when filing a PERM application, how
employers can get a prevailing wage if filing an
H-1B, H-1B1, or E-3 Labor Condition Application, and
what primary factors are considered in making the
prevailing wage determination. http://www.ows.doleta.gov/foreign/wages.asp#toc
August 02, 2005
H1B Cap
Very Close : 47,395 Cases Already Filed
The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration
Services (USCIS) advised that 47,395 new H1B
petitions have already been filed against the fiscal
year (FY) 2006 cap. This reflects approximately
20,000 filings in the month of July 2005. If new H1B
petition filings continue at this rate, the cap is
likely to be reached within weeks, at the most. The
H1B cap for regular cases is 65,000 for each fiscal
year (October 1 to September 30). However, 6,800
H1Bs are set aside for nationals of Chile and
Singapore. Only 58,200 new H1Bs, therefore, are
available for the general public; of those, just
under 11,000 H1Bs remain for the coming FY2006,
which begins October 1, 2005 and ends on September
30, 2006. However, the H1B filings for new H1Bs
under the FY2006 quota were permitted as of April 1,
2005, six months in advance of the start date of the
FY2006 quota.
In addition to the 65,000 H1B cap,
there are 20,000 special cap exemptions for people
with U.S. masters' degrees and education beyond a
U.S. master's degree. These H1B numbers still are
available for both FY2005 and FY2006. About half of
the 20,000 allotted for FY2005 have been used to
date; while fewer of the FY2006 higher education
H1Bs have been used so far, with 7,646 H1B filings
either approved or pending.
July 27, 2005
45-Day
Letters May Not be Completed by September 2005
The DOL Backlog Processing Center's
plan to have all cases entered into their system by
the end of September 2005. To meet this goal, they
are not inputting complete data on some cases. The
45-day letters, however, cannot be issued for each
case until it is fully entered into the system.
Therefore, it is likely that some cases will not
receive 45-day letters by September 2005, which was
DOL's original timeline.
Backlog
Processing Center Approvals Starting To Be Received
Although some of our clients have
yet to receive 45 day letters, we have nevertheless
started to receive approved Labor Certification from
the Backlog Processing Center. For those clients
still waiting for their 45 day letters, this is not
a problem and we appreciate your continued patience
and cooperation.
USCIS
Update on 20,000 H1Bs for FY2005
The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration
Services (USCIS) announced on July 12, 2005 that
only 8,069 petitions have been received against the
Fiscal Year (FY) 2005 allotment of 20,000 additional
H1Bs for foreign nationals who have U.S. masters'
degrees or above. There is, therefore, plenty of
these H1Bs available for those who qualify. The
advantage of obtaining one of the FY2005 numbers is
that the start date can be immediate, during FY2005,
which ends September 30, 2005. H1B cases under the
standard 65,000 quota for FY2006 cases must have a
start date no earlier than October 1, 2005.
The USCIS has not provided an update
on FY2006 numbers since recent count of 27,300
FY2006 cap-subject H1B filings, released in our July
1, 2005. We strongly recommend that those who wish
to file for the fiscal year 2006 H1B (with a October
1, 2005 start date or later) do so as early as
possible to minimize the chance that the H1B cap
will be met prior to filing. As many of our regular
readers are aware, H1B petitions may be filed up to
six months prior to the requested start date.
EB2
Category Current in Aug 2005 : September
Retrogression Possible
The U.S. Department of State (DOS)
has issued the Visa Bulletin for the month of August
2005, which continues to reflect that both EB1 and
EB2 visa numbers are current and available for all
nationals for the month of August 2005. However,
this may not continue through the end of September -
of particular concern for nationals of India and
mainland China.
The DOS has indicated that it is too
early to tell what will happen with respect to visa
numbers in September 2005. The Visa Bulletin states
that the USCIS demand for visa numbers for
adjustment of status cases continues to be high.
This is due largely to USCIS backlog reduction
efforts. Because of this demand, the DOS has stated
that it may be necessary to establish cut-off dates
for EB2 cases in September 2005. The DOS suggested
that these cut-off dates most likely would only be
established for nationals of India or mainland
China. This would be needed in order to confine the
visa numbers issued to the annual legal limit.
July 14, 2005
PERM
APPROVALS GREAT NEWS! The
Law Office Of Alan E Heckler, PC, has been receiving
PERM approvals. Approvals have been taking about 6
weeks with no denials?
June 15, 2005
EB-3
Becomes Unavailable
The U.S. Department of State (DOS) July 2005 Visa
Bulletin, issued June 13, 2005, reflects
unavailability of visa numbers in the
Employment-Based 3rd Preference (EB3)
category for all countries. This means everyone in
EB3, no matter one's country of origin or priority
date, is impacted by this development. The
exception, where there is availability of visa
numbers, is for the subcategory of Schedule A
workers, which includes nurses and physical
therapists.
Those I-485 cases that are pending will remain
pending until the visa numbers are available. If the
numbers move from unavailable to a set cut off date
(rather than becoming current), then those I-485
cases with priority dates prior to the cut off date
will be able to be approved. Visa numbers are
allocated each fiscal year. The government fiscal
year begins on October 1 of each calendar year.
Persons who are eligible to file the I-485 in the
EB3 category can still do so prior to July 1, 2005,
so it is important to move quickly.
USCIS
Provides Update on Fiscal 2006 H-1B Numbers
USCIS has provided to AILA an update on where it
stands with respect to the H-1B cap. Despite rumors
to the contrary, USCIS says it has NOT reached
enough fiscal year 2006 cap-subject H-1B petitions
to be nearing the cap.
E-Passport
Requirements
Digital Photos in VWP Passports Still Required
In a June 15, 2005 press release, DHS reiterates
that Visa Waiver Program visitors will be required
to produce passports with digital photographs by
October 26, 2005. However, requirements for circuit
chips and other biometrics are deferred until
October 26, 2006. The deadline for machine-readable
passports is still June 26, 2005.
USCIS Issues
Revised News Release on New I-90 Lock Box
On June 15, 2005, USCIS issued a revised notice
advises the public of the new procedure for filing
Form I-90, the application for a replacement green
card.
DOS
Announces that Student Visas for Chinese Nationals
Will Have Longer Validity
The State Department announced yesterday that F,
J and M visas for Chinese nationals will be valid
for 12 months and multiple entries. These changes to
the validity period take effect starting June 20,
2005.
May 5, 2005
Regulation
Implementing the 20,000 Fiscal 2005 H-1B Numbers
Published Today
Under the regulation published today, May 5,
2005, with an effective date five days later (May
12, 2005), only graduates of U.S. master's or higher
programs will be eligible. All filings must be to a
special address at the Vermont Service Center. A
special selection process is delineated if USCIS
receives more than 20,000 requests. A mechanism for
converting petitions filed for a fiscal 2006 to a
fiscal 2005 number is provided.
April 15, 2005
Retrogression or Unavailability of
Numbers for Other Workers After May
The Department of State has advised that it is
likely that numbers in the Other Workers category
will retrogress or even become unavailable after
May. The May Visa Bulletin is expected to be
released shortly.
CBP Advises on the New Fraud
Prevention and Detection Fee
In a March 18, 2005 memorandum, Michael Hrinyak
of CBP advised the field on implementation of the
new $500 Fraud Prevention and Detection Fee. The new
fee applies only to H-1B and L-1 principal
beneficiaries, and not to their spouses or children
accompanying them or following to join.
March 28, 2005
Latest
on H-1Bs
Still no word on when USCIS will
start accepting petitions for the 20,000 H-1Bs. In
the meantime, government sources confirm that the
USCIS miscounted fy2005 H-1B allocations, such that
at least 10,000 more than the 65,000 quota were
allocated. No word yet on how the miscount will be
handled.
March 17, 2005
PERM
FAQ
DOL
OFFERS GUIDANCE ON PREVAILING WAGE DETERMINATION
DOL
POLICY GUIDANCE TO THE FIELD
UPDATE
ON DOL BACKLOG REDUCTION EFFORTS
March 3, 2005
1. How many
Applications have been shipped from the SWAs to the
BRCs?
Slightly over 180,000.
2. How many
applications have had data input into the new
database systems? Approximately 86,000.
3. How many 45 day
letters have gone out?
Over 40,000.
4. How many
abandonment or withdrawals have been logged?
Almost 300 withdrawals through February 2005.
5. How many new
applications have been received by the SWAs since
December 2004? Has there been a significant increase
in new Applications in the lead-up to PERM? If so,
how is it measured?
Information not tracked by USDOL.
6. What is the number
of hired/trained contractor personnel at each BRC
site?
Approximately 100 at each and they are looking at
supplementing as DOL-ETA is making funds available.
See Item 12.
7. Will
Atlanta/Chicago continue to process traditional
cases after March 28, 2005?
They will keep some temporary work only. They are in
the process of shipping all other cases to BRCs.
There are approximately 10,000 in total.
8. Have contractors
begun to review cases for substantive compliance
with DOL guidelines? If not, when is this expected
to happen?
Yes and DOL is training now.
9. Do you continue to
believe that the backlog reduction process can be
complete in two years? If not, what is the current
projection?
Current projection is 24 to 30 months, if DOL has
adequate resources.
10. Will the same
workers at the Centers be trained on both RIR and
non-RIR cases?
They expect to cross-train initially since they do
not know what kind of cases are in the boxes.
11. When do they
expect to complete initial data entry on all cases?
The goal at this time is to finish data entry on all
cases by the end of summer 2005. Additional
resources are being made available by DOL for the
initial data entry. After data entry is completed on
all cases, the workers would move over to
processing.
12. How long will
satellite offices (New York, Boston and San
Francisco) continue to process cases?
These offices will process the cases they have until
January 2006.
13. Will there be an
on-line system available to check the status of
cases?
DOL is working on getting information on their
website about which cases have shipped. They are
also working on an e-mail capability to enable a
party to find out whether a case is located at the
BRC. The contractor staff would answer the e-mails.
14. Do they expect to
deviate from FIFO based on certain occupations?
No.
15. Regarding
standards to be applied to RIR filings, will they
apply one national standard?
No, they plan to try to apply the standard used in
the region where the case was filed.
information provided
by DOL official
January 5, 2004
PERM
IS FINALLY HERE!
As
you may have already heard, the final PERM
regulation was published in the Federal Register on
Monday, December 27, 2004.
The rule becomes effective on March 28, 2005,
90 days after publication.
This means that all labor certifications
filed on or after March 28, 2005 will be processed
under PERM. All
labor certifications filed prior to that date will
be processed under current regulations for as long
as it takes to complete such processing.
Those who
have filed under the current systems can withdraw
their application and refile under PERM and keep
their original priority date.
The current
labor certification regulations will be entirely
replaced by the new PERM regulation. More details about PERM processing will become available in
the weeks to come.
Click
for details
November 24, 2004
USCIS
Publishes Notice on H-1B Processing in Light of the
FY05 Cap Being Reached
Effective 11/23/04, the notice instructs that the
H-1B cap has been reached for FY05 and that e-filing
is suspended. H-1B extensions and non-cap H-1B cases
must now be filed under the mail-in process. H-1B
petitions with 10/1/05 start dates may be filed
starting 4/1/05.
U.S.
Consulate in Mumbai (Bombay) Closed on 11/23/04
Numerous media sources are reporting that the
U.S. Consulate in Mumbai (Bombay) and the
Information Resource Center at the American Center
were closed on 11/23/04 due to suspected terrorist
threats. No information was provided regarding when
the Consulate will reopen.
December 3, 2004
PERM
Update
So far, there has been no visible movement on the
PERM regulation for permanent labor certification,
and it is not clear when it will move. Because of
embargoes on information imposed by the Department
of Labor on a pending regulation, no solid
information is available as to what will be in the
final regulation whenever it is issued.
It is unknown what revisions have been made to
the regulation since the original draft, and
speculation regarding its contents is just
that-speculation. Please be cautious about following
advice on possible avenues of preparation. Without
knowing the actual content of the regulation, those
avenues could wind up being fruitless.
Update
on DOL Backlog Reduction Centers
DOL UPDATE (11/15/04)
Bill Carlson from DOL
l. The Backlog Reduction Centers have not yet
sent out any Center Receipt Notification Letters due
to an issue with their software. Mr. Carlson advised
that we can expect to see these letters in about two
weeks or so.
2. The DOL is now considering the move of the
next set of cases to the Backlog Reduction Centers.
Mr. Carlson advised that they may move some cases
from the processing centers in Atlanta and Chicago.
They will be looking at the SWAs from which they
will be pulling cases consistent with their
first-in-first-out (FIFO) policy. DOL will be
issuing written guidance to the states to advise
them of the FIFO policy and taking the oldest cases
and giving them instructions on what to do with the
cases (shipping, etc.).
3. In the next week or so, DOL should be
publishing a notice in the Federal Register with the
addresses and contact info for all the offices. The
information should be similar to what we were given
on Oct 8 at the Philadelphia Center but this would
be the official notification.
November 22, 2004
EB
Retrogression Still Expected in Jan 2005
The U.S. Department of State (DOS) released the
December 2004 Visa Bulletin on November 15. This
December Visa Bulletin will be valid from December 1
throughout the month of December 2004. The DOS
issues the Visa Bulletin early, which helps people
to plan. The employment-based (EB) priority dates
remain current for all categories through December
2004. The Bulletin did indicate, however, that
employment-based priority dates are still expected
to retrogress in January 2005. At this time, they
are predicting the retrogression may only impact
employment-based third-preference (EB3) cases for
foreign nationals from China (mainland born), India,
and the Philippines.
Delays in
Issuing SSNs to Aliens by the Social Security
Administration
Sometimes aliens experience significant delays
in obtaining social security numbers. The
consequences of these delays are discussed below.
Click for details http://www.irs.gov/businesses/small/international/article/0,,id=129227,00.html
Congress
Clears for President Bill to Extend J Waiver Program
for Physicians
The House, on November 17, passed
legislation that extends and modifies the
"Conrad 30" J waiver program for
foreign-born physicians. The Senate already passed
the measure (S. 2302) on October 11, so the bill now
goes to President Bush, who is expected to sign it.
Under the program, aliens who participate in medical
residencies in the United States on exchange program
(J) visas are exempted from the two-year foreign
residence requirement of INA § 212(e) if they agree
to practice medicine for three years in an area
designated by the Secretary of Health and Human
Services (HHS) as having a shortage of health care
professionals. The program has been extended several
times, most recently via the 21st Century Department
of Justice Appropriations Authorization Act (Pub. L.
No. 107-273, § 11018 (2002)), which extended the
program until June 1, 2004. S. 2302 extends it for
another two years, until June 1, 2006.
The bill also makes several important changes to
the J waiver program. First, S. 2302 specifies that
physicians who are sponsored for a waiver by either
a federal or state agency will be exempt from the
H-1B cap. In addition, the bill allows five of each
state's 30 waivers to go to doctors that practice
medicine in areas not designated by the Secretary of
HHS as having a shortage of health care
professionals, if the doctors receiving the waivers
practice in facilities that serve patients who
reside in areas designated by the Secretary as
having a shortage of health care professionals.
Finally, the measure permits foreign doctors
receiving a waiver to work in medically-underserved
areas in either primary care or specialty medicine.
Under current law, only state agencies and the
Veteran's Administration are permitted to sponsor
specialists. To request a waiver for a specialist,
however, the interested agency would be required to
demonstrate a shortage of doctors able to provide
the appropriate medical specialty in the designated
geographical area.
Section-by-Section
Summary of the L & H-1B Amendment to the Fiscal
2005 Omnibus Appropriations Bill (H.R. 4818)
PROPOSED LEGISLATION
L-1 Visa Reform
Section 11: Short Title-"L-1 Visa
(Intracompany Transferee) Reform Act of
2004"
Section 12: Non immigrant L-1 Visa
Category
This section modifies the INA § 214(c)(2) to
prevent an L-1B visa holder from being primarily
stationed at the worksite of another employer in
cases where:
(1) The L-1B visa holder will be controlled and
supervised by an unaffiliated employer, or
(2) The placement of the L-1B visa holder at the
third party site is part of an arrangement to
provide labor for the third party rather than
placement at the third party site in connection with
the provision of a product or service involving
specialized knowledge specific to the petitioning
employer.
The above modification to the law applies to
initial, extended or amended petitions filed on or
after the effective date.
Section 13: Requirement for prior
continuous employment for certain intracompany
transferees
This section strikes from INA § 214(c)(2)(A) the
provision permitting the six-month work requirement
for L-1 blanket petitions. The modification made by
this section applies only to petitions for initial
classification filed on or after the effective date
of the subtitle.
Section 14: Maintenance of Statistics by
the Department of Homeland Security
This section mandates that DHS maintains
statistics for L-1 petitions filed on or after the
effective date. Statistics will be gathered on the
following:
- Number of nonimmigrants who are classified in
the L-1B category; and
- Number of L-1B nonimmigrants who will work
primarily offsite.
Section 15: Inspector General Report
on L Visa Program
No later than 6 months after the date of
enactment, the Inspector General (IG) of DHS
shall examine and report to the House and Senate
Judiciary committees on the vulnerabilities and
the potential abuses in the L visa program.
Section 16: Establishment of Task
Force
This section mandates the development of an L
Visa Interagency Task Force no later than 6
months after the date of enactment of this act.
Included in the task force are representatives
from DHS, DOS, and DOJ.
This task force shall report to the House and
Senate Judiciary Committees on the efforts to
implement the IG's recommendations set forth by
the report mandated in section 15 above. The
task force will also include recommendations to
Congress, including suggestions for legislation.
Section 17: Effective Date
The subtitle and the Amendments made by the
subtitle take effect 180 days after the date of
enactment of the Act.
H-1B Visa Reform
Section 21: Short Title-"The
H-1B Visa Reform Act of 2004"
Section 22: Temporary Worker
Provision
a) Removes the sunset provision from INA §
212(n)(1)(E)(ii) and makes permanent the
provision requiring a non-displacement
attestation on the LCA by employers who are H-1B
dependant or have committed a willful failure or
misrepresentation during the preceding 5 years.
b) Modifies INA § 214(c)(9) by removing the
sunset provision on the employer fees and making
the fees permanent. This section also raises the
fee for each petition from $1,000 to $1,500.
Employers with no more than 25 full-time
employees employed in the U.S. will only be
responsible for ½ of the fee amount.
Section 23: Prevailing Wage Level
Modifies INA §212(p) to require employers to
pay 100% of the prevailing wage. However, this
section also mandates that where the DOL uses or
makes available to employers a governmental
survey to determine prevailing wage, such survey
shall provide 4 levels of wages commensurate
with experience, education, and the level of
supervision. If a 2 level wage survey is used,
this section provides a formula for calculating
the 2 additional intermediate levels.
Section 24: DOL Investigative
Authorities
a) Creates a new subsection (G) under INA §212(n)(2)
to take affect as if enacted on October 1, 2003.
The new subsection would:
i) Reinstates and makes permanent the
ability of DOL to initiate an investigation of
an employer if there is reasonable cause that
the employer is not in compliance with this
subsection. The Secretary of Labor (or acting
Secretary) must personally certify that
reasonable cause exists and must approve the
investigation. The investigation may be
initiated for reasons other than completeness
and obvious inaccuracies by the employer.
ii) Permits the DOL to conduct an
investigation if it receives credible
information from a known source likely to have
knowledge of an employer's practices or
conditions. The information must provide
reasonable cause that the employer has
committed a willful failure to meet a
condition, or has committed a substantial
failure to meet a condition that affects
multiple employers.
iii) Directs the DOL to create procedures
for providing information that may be used as
the basis of an investigation.
iv) An investigation under subsection (ii)
must be from information that originates from
a source other than DOL or was lawfully
obtained by DOL during another DOL
investigation.
v) Information provided to the DOL by the
employer for purposes of securing an H-1B
employee shall not be considered a receipt of
information under this subsection.
vi) No investigation or related hearing may
be conducted unless the information is
received within 12 months after the date of
the alleged failure.
vii) Directs DOL to provide notice to an
employer prior to the commencement of an
investigation with limited exception.
viii) An investigation by DOL may last for
60 days, and if there is evidence of a
violation, DOL shall provide the employer with
notice of the determination and an opportunity
for a hearing. The hearing must take place
within 120 days of the determination and a
finding must be made within 120 days of the
hearing.
b) Good Faith Compliance-This section would
modify INA §212(n)(2) so that an employer is
deemed to have complied with the section,
notwithstanding a technical or procedural
failure to meet such requirements, if there was
a good faith to comply with the requirements.
This good faith clause shall not apply if DOL
has explained the basis of the failure or if the
employer has been given time to correct the
failure and has failed to do so.
Under this subsection, an employer will not
be assessed fines or penalties for failure to
pay the prevailing wage if he can establish that
the manner in which the prevailing wage was
calculated was consistent with recognized
industry standards and practices.
|